You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Hard and Soft Selection Revisited
Vol. 29, No. 3 (Sep., 1975), pp. 465-473
Published by: Society for the Study of Evolution
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2407259
Page Count: 9
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The concepts of hard and soft selection (Wallace, 1968, 1970) have been reviewed. Juvenile mortality as well as rigid and flexible selection (Dobzhansky, 1962, 1970) have been shown to be unrelated to the ideas illustrated by the published examples of soft selection. The following definitions are suggested: hard selection is both density and frequency independent; soft selection is both density and frequency dependent. Under this classification, selection that is now referred to as 'density-dependent' would be frequency-independent while that known as 'frequency-dependent' would be density-independent (Fig. 1). An analysis of an ecological model presented by Clarke (1973a, b) reveals that under certain conditions α-, k-, and w-selection all qualify as soft selection. Clarke's α-selection is always soft; his k-selection may at times be density-dependent only.
Evolution © 1975 Society for the Study of Evolution