You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Sex Determining Temperatures in Turtles: A Geographic Comparison
J. J. Bull, R. C. Vogt and C. J. McCoy
Vol. 36, No. 2 (Mar., 1982), pp. 326-332
Published by: Society for the Study of Evolution
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2408051
Page Count: 7
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Sex ratio, Turtles, Temperature ratio, Animal nesting, Sex determination, Climate models, Incubation, Eggs, Female animals, Nesting sites
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In many turtles the hatchling's sex is determined by the incubation temperature of the egg, warm temperatures causing femaleness and cool temperatures maleness. Consequently, the population sex ratio depends upon the interaction of (i) environmental temperature, (ii) maternal choice of nest site, and (iii) embryonic control of sex determination. If environmental temperature differs between populations, then sex ratio selection is expected to adjust either maternal behavior or embryonic temperature-sensitivity to yield nearly the same sex ratio in the different populations. To test this hypothesis in part, we have compared sex determining temperatures among embryos of emydid turtles in the northern and southern U.S. We predicted that embryos of southern populations should develop as male at higher temperatures than those of northern populations. The data offer no support for this prediction among the many possible comparisons between northern and southern species. The data actually refute the prediction in both of the North-South intraspecific comparisons. Further study is needed, in particular, of nest temperatures in the different populations.
Evolution © 1982 Society for the Study of Evolution