You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Inheritance of Courtship Behavior and Its Role as a Reproductive Isolating Mechanism in Two Species of Schizocosa Wolf Spiders (Araneae; Lycosidae
Gail E. Stratton and George W. Uetz
Vol. 40, No. 1 (Jan., 1986), pp. 129-141
Published by: Society for the Study of Evolution
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2408610
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Courtship, Hybridity, Species, Female animals, Spiders, Genetics, Mating behavior, Evolution, Wolves, Genetic inheritance
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The courtship behaviors of two morphologically similar spider species, Schizocosa ocreata and S. rovneri, are distinctive and prevent interbreeding. We used "forced" copulation between these species to investigate the mode of inheritance of the courtship behavior and to determine whether postmating isolating mechanisms exist. F1 hybrids proved to be behaviorally sterile, but they were capable of producing viable offspring when forced to interbreed. Analysis of the courtship behaviors of F1, F2, and backcross progeny showed that the inheritance of some aspects of these behaviors is consistent with models involving single autosomal loci. The inheritance of secondary sexual characteristics in the males is also investigated. The genes for courtship behavior and secondary sexual characteristics do not assort independently. The origin of the premating isolating mechanisms may be explained by either an initial habitat separation between the two groups, or by a founding event with each group subsequently diverging in slightly different habitats. It is suggested that the differences in the microhabitats may have a profound effect on what type of signal (visual or vibratory) would be effective.
Evolution © 1986 Society for the Study of Evolution