You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
A Comparative Study of Diversification Events: The Early Paleozoic Versus the Mesozoic
Douglas H. Erwin, James W. Valentine and J. John Sepkoski, Jr.
Vol. 41, No. 6 (Nov., 1987), pp. 1177-1186
Published by: Society for the Study of Evolution
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2409086
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Taxa, Fossils, Evolution, Mass extinction events, Species extinction, Biological taxonomies, Paleobiology, Longevity, Extinct species, Echinoderms
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We compare two major long-term diversifications of marme animal families that began during periods of low diversity but produced strikingly different numbers of phyla, classes, and orders. The first is the early-Paleozoic diversification (late Vendian-Ordovician; 182 MY duration) and the other the Mesozoic phase of the post-Paleozoic diversification (183 MY duration). The earlier diversification was associated with a great burst of morphological invention producing many phyla, classes, and orders and displaying high per taxon rates of family origination. The later diversification lacked novel morphologies recognized as phyla and classes, produced fewer orders, and displayed lower per taxon rates of family appearances. The chief difference between the diversifications appears to be that the earlier one proceeded from relatively narrow portions of adaptive space, whereas the latter proceeded from species widely scattered among adaptive zones and representing a variety of body plans. This difference is believed to explain the major differences in the products of these great radiations. Our data support those models that hold that evolutionary opportunity is a major factor in the outcome of evolutionary processes.
Evolution © 1987 Society for the Study of Evolution