You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Parthenogenesis in a Freshwater Snail: Reproductive Assurance Versus Parasitic Release
Curtis M. Lively
Vol. 46, No. 4 (Aug., 1992), pp. 907-913
Published by: Society for the Study of Evolution
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2409745
Page Count: 7
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Two alternative (but not mutually exclusive) hypotheses were contrasted for their abilities to explain the distribution of parthenogenesis in the freshwater snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum: the reproductive assurance hypothesis, which predicts that parthenogenesis will be favored in sparse populations where mates are difficult to find, and the Red Queen hypothesis, which predicts that parthenogenesis will be favored in populations that have a low risk of parasitism. The results were inconsistent with the prediction of the reproductive assurance hypothesis; male frequency was not significantly or positively correlated with snail density. Thus, there was no support for any of the hypotheses for the maintenance of sex that rely on selection for reproductive assurance to explain the distribution of parthenogenesis (e.g., recombinational repair). The results, however, were consistent with the Red Queen hypothesis; male frequency was positively and significantly correlated with the frequency of individuals infected by trematodes. This correlation suggests that parthenogenetic females have replaced sexual females in populations where parasites are rare, and that sexual females have persisted in populations where parasites are common.
Evolution © 1992 Society for the Study of Evolution