You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Comparative Methods at the Species Level: Geographic Variation in Morphology and Group Size in Grey-Crowned Babblers (Pomatostomus temporalis)
Scott V. Edwards and Mark Kot
Vol. 49, No. 6 (Dec., 1995), pp. 1134-1146
Published by: Society for the Study of Evolution
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2410438
Page Count: 13
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We show that a new comparative method that sheds light on evolutionary trends among species may also illuminate trends within species. This finding comes from a phylogenetic autocorrelation analysis of morphological traits among individuals sampled from ten populations of a cooperatively breeding songbird, the Grey-crowned Babbler (Pomatostomus temporalis). Highly variable mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences from both the eastern (Pomatostomus temporalis temporalis) and western (Pomatostomus temporalis rubeculus) lineages were used to define genetic distances among 120 individuals and to estimate correlations among individuals in wing length, tarsus length, and body weight via an intraspecific weighting matrix. The autoregressive model effectively removed intraspecific correlations for all three morphological variables, and the proportion of the total phenotypic variance due to genealogical relationships varied from 0.68 (weight) to 0.23 (tarsus). The analysis revealed correlations among the specific components of traits, in which none were previously detected (type-I error) and diminished correlations that appeared strong when phylogeny was ignored. Group size was the only trait for which the autoregressive model failed to remove intraspecific correlations, a result likely due to the plasticity, convergence, and clinal variation in this trait in both the eastern and western lineages. The autocorrelation analysis weakened significant negative correlations between group size and total values for wing length and body weight, but the interpretation of this result depends on the adaptive significance ascribed to the "phylogenetic component" of trait values removed by the analysis. Comparative methods employing distance matrices are one useful way of summarizing the pattern of nonhierarchical relationships among conspecific individuals ("tokogenetic" relationships, sensu Hennig).
Evolution © 1995 Society for the Study of Evolution