You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Sexual Size Dimorphism and Egg-Size Allometry in Birds
Patrick J. Weatherhead and Kevin L. Teather
Vol. 48, No. 3 (Jun., 1994), pp. 671-678
Published by: Society for the Study of Evolution
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2410477
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Eggs, Female animals, Egg weight, Body size, Species, Birds of prey, Allometry, Waterfowl, Sex ratio, Body weight
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We tested the hypothesis that egg size should evolve in sexually dimorphic birds to reduce costs associated with more rapid growth by nestlings of the larger sex. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that in species in which males were larger, females laid proportionately larger eggs as sexual size dimorphism increased. However, this result was also consistent with the hypothesis that egg size varied allometrically with both male and female body size. Furthermore, we found that in species in which females were larger, relative egg size decreased as size dimorphism increased, which is consistent with the "allometry hypothesis" but not the "cost-reduction hypothesis." That male body size contributes to the allometric relationship between egg size and body size suggests that the basis for the allometric relationship is not wholly a mechanical one stemming from the physical requirements of developing, transporting, and laying an egg of a particular size. Rather, the relationship seems likely to be tied more directly to body size itself. The fact that male body size influences a female trait suggests that egg size-body size relationships offer some scope for investigating the basis for allometric relationships in general.
Evolution © 1994 Society for the Study of Evolution