You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Perspective: Metazoan Complexity and Evolution: Is There a Trend?
Daniel W. McShea
Vol. 50, No. 2 (Apr., 1996), pp. 477-492
Published by: Society for the Study of Evolution
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2410824
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Evolution, Biological evolution, Individuation, Paleobiology, Animals, Humans, Species, Biology, Fossils, Arthropods
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The notion that complexity increases in evolution is widely accepted, but the best-known evidence is highly impressionistic. Here I propose a scheme for understanding complexity that provides a conceptual basis for objective measurement. The scheme also shows complexity to be a broad term covering four independent types. For each type, I describe some of the measures that have been devised and review the evidence for trends in the maximum and mean. In metazoans as a whole, there is good evidence only for an early-Phanerozoic trend, and only in one type of complexity For each of the other types, some trends have been documented, but only in a small number of metazoan subgroups.
Evolution © 1996 Society for the Study of Evolution