You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
A Test of Queen Recruitment Models Using Nuclear and Mitochondrial Markers in the Fire Ant Solenopsis invicta
Michael A. D. Goodisman and Kenneth G. Ross
Vol. 52, No. 5 (Oct., 1998), pp. 1416-1422
Published by: Society for the Study of Evolution
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2411311
Page Count: 7
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Ants, Social insects, Insect genetics, Fire ants, Genetics, Insect colonies, Mitochondrial DNA, Shoemaking, Animal nesting, Queen insects
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We assess nestmate queen relatedness and the genetic similarity of neighboring nests in the polygyne (multiple-queen) social form of the introduced fire ant Solenopsis invicta using both nuclear and mitochondrial markers. We find that estimates of queen relatedness calculated with both types of markers do not differ statistically from zero. Furthermore, there is no significant relationship between the genetic similarity and geographic proximity of nests in each of six study sites. In contrast to these findings, sites show strong mitochondrial, but no nuclear, genetic differentiation. Our results suggest that nonnestmate queen recruitment occurs at a high frequency in introduced populations of this species. Moreover, queens within nests seem to represent a random sample of the queens within the site in which they reside. Therefore, kin selection models that rely on the recruitment of only nestmate queens to explain the persistence of polygyny in ants do not apply to polygyne S. invicta in its introduced range.
Evolution © 1998 Society for the Study of Evolution