Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Phylogenetics and Biogeography

Lars Brundin
Systematic Zoology
Vol. 21, No. 1 (Mar., 1972), pp. 69-79
DOI: 10.2307/2412259
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2412259
Page Count: 11
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Cite this Item
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Phylogenetics and Biogeography
Preview not available

Abstract

Because of the nature of the speciation process we have to admit (1) that nature has created a system of its own that is in principle hierarchic, and (2) that the biological species and strictly monophyletic species groups have been the real units of evolution. Hence only a system expressing nature's hierarchy of sister groups can function adequately as a general biological reference system. Causal biogeography, whose main method is the investigation of geographical replacement within properly reconstructed sister-group systems, is indissolubly connected with the reconstruction of nature's hierarchy. In his criticism of Hennig-Brundin, Darlington (1970) has not considered these principles. He has also overlooked that dispersal, seen in the time perspective, is a multiple process including progression in space, evolutionary change (development of comparative apomorphy), and speciation. Hence his criticism is neither relevant nor progressive.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
69
    69
  • Thumbnail: Page 
70
    70
  • Thumbnail: Page 
71
    71
  • Thumbnail: Page 
72
    72
  • Thumbnail: Page 
73
    73
  • Thumbnail: Page 
74
    74
  • Thumbnail: Page 
75
    75
  • Thumbnail: Page 
76
    76
  • Thumbnail: Page 
77
    77
  • Thumbnail: Page 
78
    78
  • Thumbnail: Page 
79
    79