You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Interpretation of the Variations in Leaf Water Potential and Stomatal Conductance Found in Canopies in the Field
P. G. Jarvis
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences
Vol. 273, No. 927, A Discussion on Water Relations of Plants (Feb. 26, 1976), pp. 593-610
Published by: Royal Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2417554
Page Count: 18
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Stomatal conductance, Leaves, Plants, Forest canopy, Water flow, Water pressure, Vapor pressure, Photosynthesis, Soil water, Water temperature
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Attempts to correlate values of stomatal conductance and leaf water potential with particular environmental variables in the field are generally of only limited success because they are simultaneously affected by a number of environmental variables. For example, correlations between leaf water potential and either flux of radiant energy or vapour pressure deficit show a diurnal hysteresis which leads to a scatter diagram if many values are plotted. However, a simple model may be adequate to relate leaf water potential to the flow of water through the plant. The stomatal conductance of illuminated leaves is a function of current levels of temperature, vapour pressure deficit, leaf water potential (really turgor pressure) and ambient CO2 concentration. Consequently, when plotted against any one of these variables a scatter diagram results. Physiological knowledge of stomatal functioning is not adequate to provide a mechanistic model linking stomatal conductance to all these variables. None the less, the parameters describing the relationships with the variables can be conveniently estimated from field data by a technique of non-linear least squares, for predictive purposes and to describe variations in response from season to season and plant to plant.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences © 1976 Royal Society