You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
An Outline of the Systematics of Oenothera Subsect. Euoenothera (Onagraceae)
Peter H. Raven, Werner Dietrich and Wilfried Stubbe
Vol. 4, No. 3 (Autumn, 1979), pp. 242-252
Published by: American Society of Plant Taxonomists
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2418422
Page Count: 11
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A new taxonomy is proposed for Oenothera subsect. Euoenothera (Onagraceae). In this group, the species that are homozygous for the three major genomic complexes, A, B, and C, are well separated from one another. Within each of these three complexes, species that form bivalents or relatively small rings of chromosomes are represented: AA (O. elata, O. longissima, O. jamesii), BB (O. grandiflora), and CC (O. argillicola). There are also complex heterozygotes with the AA (O. villosa, O. wolfii) and BB (O. austromontana) genomic constitutions. The entity that has been called O. hookeri subsp. wolfii is an AA complex heterozygote, probably of separate origin from O. villosa and here accorded taxonomic recognition as a species, as is the BB homozygote hitherto called O. biennis subsp. austromontana. Each of the three possible combinations between the A, B, and C genomes is also recognized taxonomically: AB (O. biennis), AC (O. oakesiana, earlier considered a subspecies of O. parviflora), and BC (O. parviflora). Oenothera glazioviana (O. lamarckiana auct., O. erythrosepala) has the constitution AB, like O. biennis, and may have originated following hybridization between O. biennis or O. grandiflora as the pistillate parent and O. elata (O. hookeri) as the staminate parent: this probably occurred in a garden in Europe. Minor forms, many of hybrid origin, that have originated in Europe are relegated to the species they resemble most closely. To recapitulate the taxonomic changes with respect to the most recent North American taxonomic treatment (Munz, 1965), the complex heterozygote O. wolfii (AA) is separated as a species from the bivalent-forming O. elata; O. austromontana (BB) is separated as a species from O. biennis (AB); and O. parviflora (BC; = Parviflora-1) is separated from O. oakesiana (AC; = Parviflora-2). The races that have been called Biennis-1, in which the B-complex is transmitted through the egg, and Biennis-2, in which the A-complex is transmitted through the egg, are not separated taxonomically, not usually being distinguishable in nature, despite the subspecific recognition accorded them by Munz. Among the non-complex-heterozygotes, O. hookeri is regarded as a synonym of O. elata, because of the limited distinctiveness of these two entities as recognized earlier, and their broad geographical intergradation. Oenothera glazioviana (1882) is an earlier name for what has recently been called O. erythrosepala (1903), and, prior to that, O. lamarckiana by de Vries. Earlier attempts to create a taxonomy for this subsection, particularly in recent years in Europe, have split the species too finely for a general purpose taxonomy, mainly in imitation of genetic analyses but without the requisite genetic information in most cases to do this consistently.
Systematic Botany © 1979 American Society of Plant Taxonomists