Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

NATUS IN PERGULA: TRIMALCHIONE E L' 'INUTILITÀ DELLA "DOMUS"

Anna Anguissola
Studi Classici e Orientali
Vol. 53 (2007), pp. 275-293
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24190080
Page Count: 19
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
NATUS IN PERGULA: TRIMALCHIONE E L' 'INUTILITÀ DELLA "DOMUS"
Preview not available

Abstract

This paper concentrates on a well-known passage of Petronius' Cena Trimalchionis, in which the wealthy master boasts the splendour of his palace and enumerates the spaces which, according to him, establish its social standing. These few lines, too often overlooked by modern scholarship, while raising themselves some textual problems, nevertheless provide an unexpected key for answering an intriguing set of questions raised by the whole episode about the plan of Trimalchio's abode. Coherently with a narrative strategy of tension between the character's expectations, on one side, and reality on the other, his very choice of 'prestigious' spaces disqualifies Trimalchio as an aristocratic dominus. Both the curious omission of an atrium, and the awkward 'apotheosis' painted by the main entrance point to a strategy of self-presentation that consciously avoids any hint to qualities which the owner lacks. On the other hand, the exaggeration of features as the plenty of reception rooms and the deformation of patterns like that of the labyrinth tell how the building was actually expected to be perceived. Trimalchio's proud statement that his own cubiculum was placed on the upper floor (apparently near to service quarters) is a peculiarity in itself, and suggests a broader reading of the freedman's relationship to domestic space.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[275]
    [275]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
276
    276
  • Thumbnail: Page 
277
    277
  • Thumbnail: Page 
278
    278
  • Thumbnail: Page 
279
    279
  • Thumbnail: Page 
280
    280
  • Thumbnail: Page 
281
    281
  • Thumbnail: Page 
282
    282
  • Thumbnail: Page 
283
    283
  • Thumbnail: Page 
284
    284
  • Thumbnail: Page 
285
    285
  • Thumbnail: Page 
286
    286
  • Thumbnail: Page 
287
    287
  • Thumbnail: Page 
288
    288
  • Thumbnail: Page 
289
    289
  • Thumbnail: Page 
290
    290
  • Thumbnail: Page 
291
    291
  • Thumbnail: Page 
292
    292
  • Thumbnail: Page 
293
    293