You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Relationships and Character Transformation in Pyroloideae (Ericaceae) Based on ITS Sequences, Morphology, and Development
John V. Freudenstein
Vol. 24, No. 3 (Jul. - Sep., 1999), pp. 398-408
Published by: American Society of Plant Taxonomists
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2419697
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Genera, Pollen, Botany, Taxa, Plant morphology, Inflorescences, Systematics, Chromosome morphology, Cladistics, Ovaries
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The small subfamily Pyroloideae, comprising four genera, is unusual in Ericaceae because of its nearly herbaceous habit, largely free petals, and tendencies toward leaflessness. A surprising number of hypotheses exist with respect to the relationships among these genera. Parsimony analysis of 23 morphological characters gave a pattern that is largely congruent with that obtained from analysis of ITS sequences. Two sister clades of monophyletic/monospecific genera are resolved-Chimaphila + Moneses and Orthilia + Pyrola. Relationships among three species of Chimaphila are not clearly resolved. Some structure is present within Pyrola, with two strongly supported clades (P. picta + P. aphylla + P. chlorantha and P. elliptica + P. minor). The placement of P. minor is unsuspected; most past classifications have segregated it from other Pyrola due to its short, straight style (as opposed to a longer, curved style). Developmental study reveals that the style terminates elongation early, so that in fact it is not clear which style orientation is present. The overall bud-like nature of the flower in P. minor further suggests a juvenile morphology relative to other Pyrola. The developmental information, in combination with its position on the cladogram, indicates a paedomorphic origin for the floral morphology of P. minor.
Systematic Botany © 1999 American Society of Plant Taxonomists