You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Phylogenetic Implications of Chloroplast DNA Variation in the Cyatheaceae. I.
David S. Conant, Diana B. Stein, Angela E. C. Valinski, Priya Sudarsanam and Mary E. Ahearn
Vol. 19, No. 1 (Jan. - Mar., 1994), pp. 60-72
Published by: American Society of Plant Taxonomists
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2419712
Page Count: 13
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Restriction site maps of the chloroplast DNA of four tree ferns (Alsophila bryophila, Cyathea furfuracea, Sphaeropteris cooperi, and Lophosoria quadripinnata) have been constructed using four enzymes. Genome sizes were estimated as ranging from 161.8 kilobases for L. quadripinnata to 179.2 kilobases for C. furfuracea, the largest sizes thus far reported for ferns. Evolutionary relationships of 23 species of Cyatheaceae were assessed by comparative chloroplast DNA restriction site mapping. A total of 67 restriction site mutations, 58 of which were phylogenetically informative, was detected using 20 restriction enzymes. Phylogenetic analyses of restriction site mutations were carried out using both Wagner and Dollo parsimony and the resulting monophyletic groups were evaluated by bootstrapping. The data show strong support for three major evolutionary lineages within the family: the "Alsophila clade," the "Cyathea clade," and the "Sphaeropteris clade." The "Alsophila clade" appears to be the most basal group in the family whereas the "Cyathea" and "Sphaeropteris clades" are derived sister groups. Comparison of these results to the three modern classification systems for the family demonstrates that our findings are most consistent with the system of Lellinger.
Systematic Botany © 1994 American Society of Plant Taxonomists