You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Species Concepts and Plesiomorphic Species
Richard G. Olmstead
Vol. 20, No. 4 (Oct. - Dec., 1995), pp. 623-630
Published by: American Society of Plant Taxonomists
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2419814
Page Count: 8
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Phylogenetic species concepts, in their many forms, represent an advance over previous species concepts because of their improved ability to relate species to historical patterns of evolution. A plea is made to recognize the importance of the distinction between species identifiable on the basis of uniquely derived characters (here termed apospecies) and those identifiable on the basis of a unique combination of characters, but absence of any uniquely derived character (plesiospecies). This distinction brings species concepts and phylogenetic studies more closely into accord. The ability to identify ever-finer patterns of relationship by molecular methods may result in impractical species delimitations if rigorous adherence to diagnosability or to monophyly of gene trees is the final arbiter of species. The study of gene trees and cryptic molecular characters should be used to examine processes within and among species and to clarify relationships when more readily observable characters are misleading. Operational definitions of species, based on either diagnosability or congruence among gene trees, should be viewed as hypotheses of species and as part of the process of discovering evolutionary patterns in nature that we call "species."
Systematic Botany © 1995 American Society of Plant Taxonomists