You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Die neue Ambivalenz in der Sicherheitspolitik: Sicherheitskultur als tiefer Kontext
Sicherheit und Frieden (S+F) / Security and Peace
Vol. 29, No. 2, Themenschwerpunkt: Sicherheitskultur / Security Culture (2011), pp. 72-78
Published by: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24233405
Page Count: 7
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
With regard to contemporary security threats that may severely disrupt social normality, policies for civil security meet the limits of rational calculability and planning. Civil security is increasingly defined in reference to the vulnerability of critical infrastructure, and this has given rise to distinct counterterrorism policy patterns, such as focusing on low-probability high-impact events, resorting to symbolic politics, and favouring high-tech solutions. Prioritizing new issues as security threats and rendering certain policy options as adequate solutions are manifestations of security culture. Security culture provides a deep context for policy-making and helps reduce uncertainty and ambiguity in order to overcome political dilemmas and enable policy decisions. Still, security culture is an ambivalent mechanism that can enhance or undermine the ability of a society to respond to present problems and anticipate future ones.
Sicherheit und Frieden (S+F) / Security and Peace © 2011 Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH