You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Influence of Sampling Methods on the Estimation of Population Structure in Painted Turtles
Catherine Ream and Robert Ream
The American Midland Naturalist
Vol. 75, No. 2 (Apr., 1966), pp. 325-338
Published by: The University of Notre Dame
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2423395
Page Count: 14
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A natural population of painted turtles [Chrysemys picta (Schneider)] was studied in University Bay of Lake Mendota, Dane County, Wisconsin, from September 1960 to October 1962. Five methods were used to capture turtles for marking, measurement, and release. Each of the methods yielded a different size-class distribution and a sex ratio which, in four out of five cases, was significantly different from that of the total population estimate. Baited hoop nets yielded predominantly males and relatively few juveniles; basking traps tended to yield higher percentages of females than did nets, and large turtles were an important component of the sample. Hand capture resulted in a sample heavily weighted by juveniles and a 1 : 1 sex ratio for adults. The influence of trapping method in the estimation of population structure in turtles must not be overlooked. This study indicates that even within a species, trapping method introduces considerable bias in the estimation of sex ratio and size-class distribution.
The American Midland Naturalist © 1966 The University of Notre Dame