You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Response of Breeding Bird Populations to Habitat Changes in a Giant Sequoia Forest
Bruce M. Kilgore
The American Midland Naturalist
Vol. 85, No. 1 (Jan., 1971), pp. 135-152
Published by: The University of Notre Dame
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2423918
Page Count: 18
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Bird nesting, Coniferous forests, Birds, Forest habitats, Species, Vegetation, Biomass, Nesting tables, Aviculture, Riparian forests
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Thirty species from the montane forest formation comprised most of the breeding bird population of a giant sequoia forest, with a density ranging from 188 to 311 pairs per 100 acres (40 ha). When some 22 tons of living and dead trees per acre in the brush or sapling layer of this forest were eliminated by cutting, piling and prescribed burning, the change in character of vegetation and the openness of the low vegetation zone led to changes in species composition but not in total biomass of the avifauna. This was true because thickets of small trees were the least important vegetation for bird feeding or nesting; the upper canopy and understory were most important, followed by the ground and trunk categories. Two species of ground-feeding and nesting birds and a third ground-nesting species disappeared after treatment. Nesting flycatchers and robins increased in numbers. Compared with results from areas where wildfires or logging operations have made substantial changes in cover type and set succession back severely, this degree of habitat modification resulted in relatively small avifaunal changes.
The American Midland Naturalist © 1971 The University of Notre Dame