You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Phenological Pattern in the Shortgrass Prairie
C. E. Dickinson and Jerrold L. Dodd
The American Midland Naturalist
Vol. 96, No. 2 (Oct., 1976), pp. 367-378
Published by: The University of Notre Dame
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2424076
Page Count: 12
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Data were collected for 1 year on 34 range plant species and for 2 years on six species to describe phenological timing in the shortgrass prairie of northeastern Colorado and also to determine whether there were any distinct groups of plants for which a single species could be used as a phenological indicator. Observations were made in four grazing treatments and two water amendment areas (one with 100 kg/ha mineral N added). Water amendments altered the phenology of some species, while grazing and nitrogen treatments had no measurable effects on phenology. Standard cool- and warm-season classification of plants does not adequately describe the phenological dynamics of the short-grass prairie. For example, Buchloe dactyloides, a warm-season grass, flowers with Agropyron smithii, a cool-season grass, rather than with Bouteloua gracilis, another warm-season grass. Four general categories of plants having different flowering capacities are recognized: blooming only once very early in the growing season; blooming twice with a summer dormancy period; blooming once during midsummer with blooming delayed during drought; and blooming only once late in the growing season.
The American Midland Naturalist © 1976 The University of Notre Dame