You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Winter Habitat Selection by North Temperate Cave Bats
Richard L. Raesly and J. Edward Gates
The American Midland Naturalist
Vol. 118, No. 1 (Jul., 1987), pp. 15-31
Published by: The University of Notre Dame
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2425624
Page Count: 17
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Bats, Caves, Species, Microhabitats, Hibernation, Enterobacteriaceae, Microclimates, Habitat selection, Radiocarbon, Discriminants
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Discriminant function analysis was used to quantify both microhabitat (within-cave) and macrohabitat (among-cave) locations selected by five species of cave-dwelling bats in the limestone caves and mines of Maryland, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Microhabitat parameters reflected microclimate, physical structure and behavioral interactions at the roosting site. Macrohabitat parameters described cave macroclimate, structure, size and external habitat features. Three discriminant functions accounting for more than 95% of the variance were derived in the microhabitat analysis. Function I was correlated with microclimate and the tendency to cluster, function II with the exposure of the site, and function III with the draftiness of the location. There was a large degree of overlap along many of the univariate parameters, particularly temperature. Multivariate classification of the five species was 63.5% correct. Parameters that were important on a macrohabitat scale differed among species. Zones of suitable microhabitat available within a cave or mine were important factors, but presence or absence of a species at a cave or mine could not be accounted for solely by differences at this level. Cave size is shown to be important to several species in this guild. Correct multivariate classifications varied by species from 82.0 to 96.0%.
The American Midland Naturalist © 1987 The University of Notre Dame