You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Morphologic Variation of the Bobcat (Felis rufus) in the Eastern United States and Its Association with Selected Environmental Variables
Robert S. Sikes and Michael L. Kennedy
The American Midland Naturalist
Vol. 128, No. 2 (Oct., 1992), pp. 313-324
Published by: The University of Notre Dame
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2426465
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Female animals, Age structure, Natural history museums, Bobcats, Science and technology museums, Museum collections management, Museums, Blisters, Animal morphology, Matrices
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Cranial characters of bobcats (Felis rufus) from the eastern United States were examined using univariate and multivariate techniques to assess morphologic variation and to identify relationships among morphologic features and selected environmental variables. The patterns of variation produced using principal component analysis indicated that larger males occurred in northern and eastern localities, whereas N-central localities produced the largest females. The smallest individuals of both sexes occurred in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Comparisons of matrices for overall environmental variation and variation of individual environmental variables with matrices of morphologic variation showed a higher degree of correlation for females than for males. These results suggest that variation in female morphology may be under somewhat different selective constraints than corresponding variation in males.
The American Midland Naturalist © 1992 The University of Notre Dame