You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Differences in the Spectral Characteristics of Birch Canopies Exposed to Simulated Acid Rain
T. W. Ashenden and J. H. Williams
The New Phytologist
Vol. 109, No. 1 (May, 1988), pp. 79-84
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2433134
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: pH, Plants, Acid soils, Vegetation canopies, Rain, Acid rain, Simulations, Wavelengths, Seedlings, Soil pollution
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Seedlings of silver birch in a polythene tunnel were exposed to simulated acid rain at pH values of 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 and 5.6 while growing in pots of either John Innes No. 2 potting compost or an Arfon series soil. Measurements of visible and near infrared radiance were taken from the canopies of groups of plants exposed to each of the rainfall treatments, after 34 weeks for plants grown in John Innes compost, and after 75 weeks for plants grown in both soils. Plots of reflectance against wavelength revealed that only plants exposed to the control pH 5.6 treatment retained the shape of curve that is characteristic of healthy green vegetation. Discriminant analysis showed that the radiometer data could be used to distinguish between birch canopies which had been exposed to the different rainfall treatments after both 34 and 75 weeks. The potential use of radiometry is discussed for identifying plants growing under the stress of acid rainfall in both controlled environments and in the field. It is apparent that further research using the more sensitive scanners now available will be required in order to improve the accuracy of this survey technique.
The New Phytologist © 1988 New Phytologist Trust