You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Gamete Donation and Parental Responsibility
Journal of Applied Philosophy
Vol. 20, No. 1 (2003), pp. 77-87
Published by: Wiley
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24354988
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Gametes, Parenthood, Children, Geneticism, Applied philosophy, Existence, Medical genetics, Parents, Adopted children, Human genetics
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Unlike surrogacy and cloning, reproduction via gamete donation is widely assumed to be morally unproblematic. Recently, a number of authors have argued that this assumption is mistaken: gamete donors, they claim, have parental responsibilities that they typically treat too lightly. In this paper I argue that the 'parental neglect' case against gamete donation fails. I begin by examining and rejecting the view that gamete donors have parental responsibilities; I claim that none of the current accounts of parenthood provides good reason for ascribing parenthood to gamete donors. I then argue that even if gamete donors do have parental responsibilities for 'their' children, it is not clear that they treat these responsibilities too lightly. I conclude the paper by examining the wider question of just what kind of responsibilities gamete donors might have towards the children that they have a role in creating.
Journal of Applied Philosophy © 2003 Wiley