You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Comparative Host Ranges of Six Plant Viruses
W. C. Price
American Journal of Botany
Vol. 27, No. 7 (Jul., 1940), pp. 530-541
Published by: Botanical Society of America, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2437088
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Viruses, Plants, Mosaic, Species, Phytopathology, Viral diseases, Leaves, Plant diseases, Plant viruses, Mosaic viruses
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A large number of plant species were tested for susceptibility to six different viruses. Including plants shown to be susceptible by other workers, tobacco-necrosis virus infected 88 species in 37 families but failed to infect 25 species in 13 of these families and 28 species in 20 other families; tobacco-ringspot virus infected 143 species in 40 families but failed to infect 14 species in 13 of these families and 21 species in 16 other families; tomato-ringspot virus infected 54 species in 35 families but failed to infect 17 species in 12 of these families and 29 species in 20 other families; cucumber-mosaic virus infected 191 species in 40 families but failed to infect 21 species in 12 of these families and 25 species in 19 other families; cucurbit-mosaic virus infected 5 species in 1 family but failed to infect 107 species in 52 families; and alfalfa-mosaic virus infected 92 species in 28 families but failed to infect 16 species in 12 of these families and 43 species in 28 other families. The results indicate that ability of a plant to support increase of virus in its tissues is a characteristic of the species and, with respect to at least five of the six viruses studied, has little or no relationship to the taxonomic position of the family.
American Journal of Botany © 1940 Botanical Society of America, Inc.