You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
A contradiction in terms: Skelton's 'effecte energiall' in "A Replycacion"
Vol. 17, No. 1, Bonae Litterae: Current Research on the "Studia Humanitatis" (MARCH 2003), pp. 55-68
Published by: Wiley
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24413371
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Inspiration, Poetry, Elizabethan poetry, Religious poetry, Soul, Inventions, Literary criticism, Theology, Aristotelianism, Heresy
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
This paper tests the commonplace that John Skelton's late poem A Replycacion (1527–8) contains the first English formulation of the Platonic theory of divine inspiration. It argues first that Skelton's use of the term 'effecte energiall' suggests the influence of Aristotle as well as of Plato, second that Skelton's 'divine inspiration' can be read as a metaphor for the activity of the poet's own mind. In asserting the poet's originary power at a time when his authority was still widely thought to be derivative, the poem thus anticipates late sixteenth-century views of poetic authority.
Renaissance Studies © 2003 Wiley