You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Welwitschia mirabilis and Neoteny
American Journal of Botany
Vol. 64, No. 7 (Aug., 1977), pp. 916-920
Published by: Botanical Society of America, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2442386
Page Count: 5
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The adult Welwitschia is generally considered to be "a persistent seedling" and a classical example of neoteny. In the author's opinion, and after twenty years study of the plant, the neotenic interpretation appears inadequate. The question is to inquire if authentic juvenile characters persist in the adult stage; when closely considered, the answer is, they do not. Welwitschia is not a neotenic, but a "handicapped" plant. In a proper sense, it has "lost its head" at an early stage. Hundreds, or even a thousand years later, it still produces new roots, new buds, new branches, and new bracteal leaves, i.e., vegetative productions. Without in yoking any intervention of neotenic agents, the history of the plant may be reduced to seven events, each one with its ineluctable morphogenetic consequence. Starting with these views, it is possible to imagine several experimental approaches, designed to throw some light on the phyletic problem
American Journal of Botany © 1977 Botanical Society of America, Inc.