You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Vine Photosynthesis and Relationships to Climbing Mechanics in a Forest Understory
Gregory A. Carter and Alan H. Teramura
American Journal of Botany
Vol. 75, No. 7 (Jul., 1988), pp. 1011-1018
Published by: Botanical Society of America, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2443769
Page Count: 8
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Photosynthesis in a deciduous forest understory was studied for three exotic vine species (Pueraria lobata, Lonicera japonica, and Hedera helix) and five common native species (Rhus radicans, Clematis virginiana, Smilax rotundifolia, Vitis vulpina, and Parthenocissus quinque-folia) possessing a variety of climbing mechanisms. The adventitious-root climbers (H. helix and R. radicans) had the lowest maximum photosynthetic rates of all species (5.5 and 6.4 μmol m-2 s-1, respectively). The twining vine P lobata was the most poorly adapted to the understory with a high light-compensation point (43 μmol m-2 s-1), low photosynthesis under low light (0.5 μmol m-2 s-1 at 50 μ mol m-2 s-1), and the highest light requirement for obtaining 90% of maximum photosynthesis (860 μmol m-2 s-1). Lonicera japonica, another twining vine, was better-adapted to low light conditions, but vines with tendril climbing mechanics were physiologically the best adapted to low light. The adhesive-tendril climber P. quinquefolia was the most highly adapted to shade, with a low light compensation point (20 μ mol m-2 s-1), a high photosynthetic rate under low light (3.5 μmol m-2 s-1), and a low light saturation point (160 μ mol m-2 s-1). Results suggest that physiological adaptability of vines to low-light environments may be related to climbing mechanics.
American Journal of Botany © 1988 Botanical Society of America, Inc.