You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Significance of Allozyme Variation and Introgression in the Liriodendron tulipifera Complex (Magnoliaceae)
Clifford R. Parks, Jonathan F. Wendel, Mitchell M. Sewell and Yin-Long Qiu
American Journal of Botany
Vol. 81, No. 7 (Jul., 1994), pp. 878-889
Published by: Botanical Society of America, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2445769
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Coastal plains, Highlands, Vouchers, Population genetics, Peninsulas, Gulfs, Population estimates, Alleles, Genetics, Botany
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Fifty populations of Liriodendron tulipifera were sampled and scored for electrophoretic variation at 23 loci. The level of genetic polymorphism and population differentiation is greater in L. tulipifera than is usual for an outbreeding species. Since this species exhibits a cline of morphological and ecological variation from north to south, the 50 populations were divided into seven geographically defined regional groupings: three from the Appalachian uplands, three from the southeastern coastal plains, and one from the Florida peninsula. Nei's genetic identity, I, was calculated for all within- and among-population and region comparisons. The populations from the upland regions clustered closely together while the coastal plain populations were similar but measurably separated from the upland ones. The populations from the Florida peninsula were markedly divergent. A principal components analysis of the same data set revealed a nearly identical pattern of population clustering. Two hypotheses were explored to explain the pattern observed: 1) post-Pleistocene differentiation and migration from a single refugium and; 2) sympatry of two previously isolated taxa during glacial maxima, followed by introgression and migration. The weight of evidence best supports the introgression hypothesis which is explained in terms of plant migration events during Pleistocene time. The level and distribution of electrophoretic variation in L. tulipifera is compared to that of other woody taxa in which historical events of the Pleistocene may have contributed to modern levels and patterns of variation.
American Journal of Botany © 1994 Botanical Society of America, Inc.