You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
A Saucer Model of Southeast Asian Identity
Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science
Vol. 27, No. 1, Special Focus: Reconceptualizing Southeast Asia (1999), pp. 7-23
Published by: Brill
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24492977
Page Count: 17
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Asians, Southeast Asian literature, Indian literature, Countries, Southeast Asian studies, Universities, Southeast Asian culture, British literature, Chinese culture, Agriculture
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This essay argues for an indigenous origin of the Southeast Asian idea. Two inherently Southeast Asian factors determined that the region would be seen as one: (i) a positive view from what we now call Malaysia/Singapore, that it sits in the centre of a meaningful region called by a diversity of names. This self-conscious centrality is based, however, on communications, not on civilization or empire like the cores of many other historic regions. The Malacca Straits area has always been a meeting place of ports and portages, not a centre of agriculturally-based population, large armies, architectural or literary monuments; (ii) a negative decision by the peripheries of this region that they did not want to be appendages of their larger and more threatening neighbours, so that Southeast Asia became a kind of default option.
Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science © 1999 Brill