You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Comparison of the Effects of Continuous Video Modeling, Video Prompting, and Video Modeling on Task Completion by Young Adults with Moderate Intellectual Disability
Linda C. Mechling, Kevin M. Ayres, Kathryn J. Bryant and Ashley L. Foster
Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities
Vol. 49, No. 4 (December 2014), pp. 491-504
Published by: Division on Autism and Developmental Disabilities
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24582346
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Video modeling, Autistic disorder, Cleaning, Developmental disabilities, High school students, Special needs students, Towels, Intellectual disability, Disabilities, Special education
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This study compared the effects of three procedures (video prompting: VP, video modeling: VM, and continuous video modeling: CVM) on task completion by three high school students with moderate intellectual disability. The comparison was made across three sets of fundamentally different tasks (putting away household items in clusters of two items; multi-step cleaning tasks whereby each step in the task was completed one time; and multi-component folding tasks whereby steps were performed repetitively). The study combined a multiple probe across behaviors design with an adapted alternating treatments design replicated across three participants. Overall, VP was more effective across the three students for 6 of the 9 tasks, followed by CVM (2 of 9 tasks), and VM (1 of 9 tasks). These data further suggest that the type of task and student characteristics may influence the effectiveness of the three video procedures.
Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities © 2014 Division on Autism and Developmental Disabilities