You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Insular Biogeography in Continental Regions. I. The Northern Andes of South America
The American Naturalist
Vol. 104, No. 938 (Jul. - Aug., 1970), pp. 373-388
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2459123
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Species, Birds, Vegetation, Mathematical independent variables, Archipelagos, Modeling, Linear regression, Biogeography, Taxa, Linear models
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In order to test whether the theory of insular biogeography also applies to a continental situation, species diversity and endemism were studied among the birds living in islands of paramo vegetation above timberline in the northern Andes of South America. Stepwise regression analyses were performed, assuming that measures of environmental diversity (especially area) and of isolation (interisland distances) permit prediction of species numbers and numbers of endemics in a continental situation, as they do in archipelagos. With seven independent variables included in the equations, prediction of species diversity and endemism was extremely good. From 92% to 97% of the variance in species numbers can be accounted for by regression, the best fit (97%) being obtained with a linear model. From 87% to 93% of the variance in number of endemics can be predicted by regression, a semilog model providing the best fit (93 % ). The Andean islands conform to archipelagos in two ways: first, because the species-area curve offers a reasonable prediction, as a first approximation, of species numbers; and second, because the numbers of endemics can best be predicted by some measure of interisland distance. The paramo islands differ from oceanic islands, however, because the distance effect curve is more linear than exponential, and because there is no statistically significant correlation between endemism and area of islands. These differences can be explained if isolation between islands is less absolute, so that the probability distribution of dispersal away from a source area is uniform, instead of exponential or normal.
The American Naturalist © 1970 The University of Chicago Press