You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
ART AND IDEOLOGY: THE CASE OF THE PERGAMON GIGANTOMACHY
Vol. 48 (2005), pp. 163-174
Published by: Classical Association of South Africa
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24595401
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Giants, Altars, Humans, Animal wings, Asian art, Artistic representation, Iconography, Claws, Abstract art, Civilization
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The Attalid rulers of Hellenistic Pergamon, in Asia Minor, strove to make their city the cultural equal of classical Athens through public building and art. They represented their partial victory over the Galatians as the equivalent of the Athenian triumph over the Persians. A major Attalid public monument suggesting this was the Great Altar at Pergamon, with its frieze depicting Gigantomachy (the battle of gods and giants). The article discusses the representation of gigantomachy in earlier Greek art, and shows how the Pergamon frieze intensifies certain ideological tendencies of that representation. The frieze uses many contrasts - animal vs. human, high vs. low, calm control vs. frenzied emotion - to suggest the superiority of the Attalids over their enemies. But there are many elements that cut across these contrasts, making the frieze more than a simple ideological statement.
Acta Classica © 2005 Classical Association of South Africa