Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:

login

Log in through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Journal Article

Interacting Selective Pressures in Conifer-Bark Beetle Systems: A Basis for Reciprocal Adaptations?

Kenneth F. Raffa and Alan A. Berryman
The American Naturalist
Vol. 129, No. 2 (Feb., 1987), pp. 234-262
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2462002
Page Count: 29

You can always find the topics here!

Topics: Bark beetles, Trees, Engraving, Monoterpenes, Beetles, Resins, Coleoptera, Mortality, Insect ecology, Fungi
Were these topics helpful?
See something inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($19.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Interacting Selective Pressures in Conifer-Bark Beetle Systems: A Basis for Reciprocal Adaptations?
Preview not available

Abstract

Conifer-bark beetle interactions provide a useful model system for evaluating potentially reciprocal selective pressures between plants and insects. The phloem-feeding bark beetles that infest living conifer stems are a major source of host mortality, and their successful reproduction is usually contingent on the death of the tree. Trees respond to invasion by producing a series of localized secretions and biochemical alterations that can contain the insect and associated microorganisms. We describe the relative advantages and disadvantages of two beetle reproductive strategies: overwhelming trees with a synchronized mass attack; and selecting weakened trees that cannot offer strong resistance. Differences in the defensive physiology of grand fir, Abies grandis (Douglas) Lindley, and lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelmann, may be partially responsible for differences in the behavior of the fir engraver beetle, Scolytus ventralis LeConte, and the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, respectively. Both tree species react to controlled inoculation with fungal symbionts of the beetle by producing monoterpenes and other defensive chemicals that may or may not be present in uninjured tissue. Grand fir, however, undergoes a more extensive series of biochemical conversions than does lodgepole pine. The relative extent of these responses appears to have resulted in different optimal behaviors by the two bark beetle species. Because they are not strongly repelled by host monoterpenes, mountain pine beetles enter trees that can be made suitable only by the arrival of additional colonizers. Fir engravers are repelled by cues associated with strong defensive capacity and orient solely to weakened trees. Their aggregation behavior is somewhat cooperative, but it also includes elements of social parasitism. Even though colonization by bark beetles usually leads to tree death, the effect on host fitness varies with age and ecological status. Because of factors affecting both resistance and substrate suitability, most trees are able to produce cones for several decades before attack. Where lodgepole pine is seral, there is probably little selection for resistance once late-successional species have grown into the understory. We examine the theory that a synchronous decline in resistance capacity among old trees in even-aged stands increases the likelihood of beetle epidemics and subsequent fires, thereby favoring reestablishment of lodgepole pine. Later-successional species, like grand fir, are apparently not favored by beetle outbreaks, and all age groups sampled seem physiologically capable of defending themselves against attack. We discuss the interactions between beetle and conifer traits and whether these can affect reproductive rates. We propose a model in which several feedback processes operating among groups of traits, rather than strictly deterministic pathways or single biochemical causes, structure the plant-insect interaction. Finally, we discuss the general implications to coevolutionary theory.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[234]
    [234]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
235
    235
  • Thumbnail: Page 
236
    236
  • Thumbnail: Page 
237
    237
  • Thumbnail: Page 
238
    238
  • Thumbnail: Page 
239
    239
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[240]
    [240]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
241
    241
  • Thumbnail: Page 
242
    242
  • Thumbnail: Page 
243
    243
  • Thumbnail: Page 
244
    244
  • Thumbnail: Page 
245
    245
  • Thumbnail: Page 
246
    246
  • Thumbnail: Page 
247
    247
  • Thumbnail: Page 
248
    248
  • Thumbnail: Page 
249
    249
  • Thumbnail: Page 
250
    250
  • Thumbnail: Page 
251
    251
  • Thumbnail: Page 
252
    252
  • Thumbnail: Page 
253
    253
  • Thumbnail: Page 
254
    254
  • Thumbnail: Page 
255
    255
  • Thumbnail: Page 
256
    256
  • Thumbnail: Page 
257
    257
  • Thumbnail: Page 
258
    258
  • Thumbnail: Page 
259
    259
  • Thumbnail: Page 
260
    260
  • Thumbnail: Page 
261
    261
  • Thumbnail: Page 
262
    262
Part of Sustainability