You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
A Sexual-Selection Model for the Evolution of Imitative Learning of Song in Polygynous Birds
The American Naturalist
Vol. 134, No. 4 (Oct., 1989), pp. 599-612
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2462062
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Bird songs, Female animals, Evolution, Mating behavior, Sexual selection, Observational learning, Sons, Popular songs, Genotypes, Species
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Although normal song development in oscines depends on imitative learning, it presumably was innately determined (directly inherited, nonmodifiable) in the ancestral species. Evolution of imitative song from innate song is investigated theoretically, using a genetic model of sexual selection by female choice in a polygynous population. Since song is usually limited to sexually mature males and since females exhibited preferences with respect to various aspects of song, sexual selection may well have been involved. Specifically, it is assumed that imitative learning may give rise to a variant song that some females prefer over innate song and also that female preference is not affected by early song experience. However, the assumption of polygyny restricts the applicability of the results obtained here, since most bird species are monogamous. It is shown that the coevolution of imitative song and female preference from low initial frequencies requires a strong preference. The available data, although not of direct relevance, suggest that such strong preference may sometimes occur. When females that show preference are more common than those that mate indiscriminately, a twofold difference in preference may still be necessary for imitative song to be favored. If female preference is assumed to be fixed, the effect of various modes of song transmission can be compared. It is shown that transmission from father to son is critical and must be efficient, unless compensated for by strong female preference. Moreover, initial increase of imitative song is less likely to occur if paternal song is forgotten and replaced by a new song learned from another adult male. These predictions may be difficult to reconcile with the assumption of polygyny, which may imply limited opportunity for interaction between father and son. Finally, the conditions for the evolution of imitative song are compared with those for the evolution of human speech. The latter were obtained previously from a model assuming that speech serves to communicate adaptive cultural traits from parent to child. The conditions are highly analogous in spite of the disparity in the selective forces assumed.
The American Naturalist © 1989 The University of Chicago Press