You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
R. N. Jones
The American Naturalist
Vol. 137, No. 3, Symposium: The Genetics and Evolutionary Biology of Meiotic Drive (Mar., 1991), pp. 430-442
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2462577
Page Count: 13
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The view of B-chromosome polymorphisms that is coming into favor resembles the so-called "parasitic" model, which was first advanced 45 yr ago. Since that time, repeated and ongoing efforts have been made to ascribe an adaptive role to B's (e.g., in terms of phenotypic advantage, effects of variability, etc.), but success in this direction has been singularly lacking. Consistently and repeatedly, the data indicate that harmful effects, or at best neutral or undetectable effects, are associated with B's and provide evidence of the potency of accumulation mechanisms based on drive. Modeling exercises have proved useful in examining these polymorphisms, and of the ones that have been published to date, all have favored drive as the main force generating B-chromosome polymorphisms.
The American Naturalist © 1991 The University of Chicago Press