You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Does Lekking Promote the Evolution of Male-Biased Size Dimorphism in Birds? On the Use of Comparative Approaches
Jacob Hoglund and Birgitta Sillen-Tullberg
The American Naturalist
Vol. 144, No. 6 (Dec., 1994), pp. 881-889
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2463133
Page Count: 9
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
An early study compared the size dimorphism of lekking and nonlekking birds by out-group analysis (i.e., evolutionarily independent clades) and could not find, contrary to common belief, that lekking birds were more size dimorphic than their close relatives. A subsequent study reanalyzed the data using different comparative approaches and did find the postulated relationship This study compared the generic means of sister taxa that differ in mating system (lekking vs. nonlekking) and analyzed concentrations of size dimorphism and lekking in a reconstruction of the bird phylogeny. In the present article we have once again reanalyzed the data and extended the comparative analyses. We find no evidence that lekking birds show more size dimorphism when compared to their close relatives and argue that the result of the second study can be explained mainly by the inclusion or exclusion of taxa and a bias introduced by a few clades in which size dimorphism indeed is larger in the lekking taxa. However, when independent evolutionary events are analyzed, lekking does not seem to promote the evolution of male-biased size dimorphism.
The American Naturalist © 1994 The University of Chicago Press