You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Studies on the Physiology of Regeneration Buds of Hordeum bulbosum
M. Ofir, D. Koller and M. Negbi
Vol. 128, No. 1 (Mar., 1967), pp. 25-34
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2473036
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Dormancy, Sprouting, Plant bulbs, Plants, Agricultural seasons, High temperature, Moisture content, Harvesting seasons, Flower buds, Rhizomes
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The regeneration buds of Hordeum bulbosum L. were found in relatively constant numbers and positions in relation to the bulbs, which are situated at the bases of flowering shoots, below the soil surface. Changes in the levels of dormancy were studied by tests of their ability to sprout and/or root when harvested at intervals during the season of dormancy. Relaxation of dormancy was associated with increase in the fraction of active bulbs, as well as in the number of active buds on each. The ability of the bulbs, as well as of the buds, to become active at low temperatures preceded their ability to do so at high ones, though temperature sensitivity was subsequently negligible. Marked positional differences found among the buds on each bulb were expressed in the extent of the morphological development of the buds, activation potential and its temperature interactions, rate of relaxation of dormancy, kinetics of activation, relationships between rooting and sprouting capacity, and changes in them during the relaxation of dormancy. The results are interpreted as indicating that an agent which induces the transformation of axillary buds into regeneration buds reaches them at or about the time of flower initiation. The positional differences reflect gradients in receptivity of the buds toward this agent, peaking in the bud on the node subtending the bulb and decreasing in progressively younger or older buds. The disappearance of temperature sensitivity with relaxation of dormancy was accompanied by a marked upward shift in the temperature optimum. The survival value of this shift under Mediterranean climatic conditions is discussed. Relaxation of dormancy is apparently a two-stage process, the first affecting rooting and sprouting differentially, the second doing so equally. Two alternative hypotheses are suggested, one involving control by two systems, the other by a single one. The moisture content of the bulb was a factor that determined whether its buds would become nonviable, sprout (when non-dormant), or remain viable and progress in relaxation of dormancy. Under field conditions the moisture content required for viability and relaxation of dormancy depends on a sustained supply of moisture from deeper soil layers via live roots.
Botanical Gazette © 1967 The University of Chicago Press