You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Influence of Temperature and Daylength on Growth and Sugar Content of Sugar Cane Following Auxin Treatment of Cuttings
W. C. Hall and M. A. Khan
Vol. 116, No. 3 (Mar., 1955), pp. 274-281
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2473348
Page Count: 8
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
1. Stem cuttings of a commercial variety of sugar cane, C.P. (Canal Point) 36/13, were treated by soaking in aqueous solutions of several synthetic auxins: indoleacetic acid (IAA), indolebutyric acid (IBA), sodium naphthaleneacetate (NAA), and the amine salt of alpha-or-tho-chlorophenoxypropionic acid (a-O-CPA). Different concentrations and combinations of auxins were employed. 2. The effects of such auxin treatment on the growth and sugar content of plants were correlated with temperature and supplementary illumination during their development to maturity. Their response was compared with that of plants produced from untreated cuttings. Under normal conditions auxin treatment increased the height of the main axis, stimulated tillering, and increased sucrose but decreased reducing sugars. The number of green leaves produced was not significantly different in treated and untreated plants. The rate of stem elongation and tillering increased rapidly as the seasonal temperatures increased, especially tillering in auxin-treated plants. 3. Plants produced from auxin-treated cuttings and exposed to 4 hours of additional illumination daily were taller, developed more leaves, and contained more reducing sugars, but produced fewer tillers and less sucrose than did similarly treated plants kept under natural-day conditions.
Botanical Gazette © 1955 The University of Chicago Press