You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Chemistry and Microstructure of Protein Bodies in Celery Endosperm
D. Dwarte and A. E. Ashford
Vol. 143, No. 2 (Jun., 1982), pp. 164-175
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2474703
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Endosperm, Oxalates, Crystals, Celery, Embryos, Calcium, Body regions, Aleurone cells, Toluidines, Germination
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Anatomical variations in regions of the endosperm and the structure and composition of protein bodies of ungerminated celery (A pium graveolens) fruits were examined by histochemistry, light microscopy, electron microscopy, and X-ray analysis. Protein bodies contained either phytin globoids with Mg and P and lesser amounts of Ca and K or Ca oxalate druse crystals that had only Ca peaks. Most of the Ca in the fruit is stored in the druse crystals, which are broken down more slowly than the globoids during germination. Cells in the central region of the endosperm, distal to the cotyledons, contained enlarged protein bodies and other cellular features, indicating that they had already undergone some autolysis prior to the onset of germination. Such cells would be expected to appear to respond earlier to the application of exogenous gibberellin than more peripheral cells in the endosperm. The apparent early response of central cells in isolated endosperm halves may therefore not depend on an inherent difference in the response time of these cells, but rather on the fact that they had already been exposed to a gibberellin-like stimulus earlier in fruit development.
Botanical Gazette © 1982 The University of Chicago Press