You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Flower-Inducing Potency of Different Kinds of Leaves in Soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.
S. Shanmugasundaram and M. S. Lee
Vol. 142, No. 1 (Mar., 1981), pp. 36-39
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2474784
Page Count: 4
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Plants, Leaves, Flowers, Cotyledons, Photoperiod, Soybeans, Flowering, Branches, Seed pods, Seeds
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The flower-inducing potencies of different kinds of leaves were studied in 10-h and 16-h photoperiods with two soybean cultivars (Glycine max [L] Merr.), photoperiod-sensitive accession G 2120 and day-neutral accession G 215. Regardless of photoperiod, the day-neutral cultivar produced flowers, pods, and seeds where cotyledon(s) alone, unifoliolate(s) alone, cotyledons and unifoliolates together, or trifoliolate(s) alone were exposed to photoperiodic treatment. Cotyledonary and unifoliolate leaves alone are evidently capable of producing sufficient flower-inducing stimulus and photosynthate to saturate the flowering response of the day-neutral plant. However, the number of pods and seeds produced was greatest in plants having all trifoliolate leaves. The photoperiod-sensitive cultivar did not produce flowers without trifoliolate leaves even under 10-h photoperiods. This cultivar thus has an obligate vegetative phase, i.e., the period from emergence until the first trifoliolate leaf is fully unfolded.
Botanical Gazette © 1981 The University of Chicago Press