You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis
Joel Huber, John W. Payne and Christopher Puto
Journal of Consumer Research
Vol. 9, No. 1 (Jun., 1982), pp. 90-98
Published by: Oxford University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2488940
Page Count: 9
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
An asymmetrically dominated alternative is dominated by one item in the set but not by another. Adding such an alternative to a choice set can increase the probability of choosing the item that dominates it. This result points to the inadequacy of many current choice models and suggests product line strategies that might not otherwise be intuitively plausible.
Journal of Consumer Research © 1982 Oxford University Press