You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Comments on "Price and Value of Decision Support Systems"
Kranti V. Toraskar and Prafulla N. Joglekar
Vol. 14, No. 1 (Mar., 1990), pp. 7-12
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/249301
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Decision support systems, Cost benefit analysis, Prices, Cost estimates, Business structures, Assessed values, Wheels, Management information systems, Conflicts of interest
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Pieptea and Anderson's (1987) article promised to reconcile the conflicting approaches in cost-benefits literature on DSS. However, we find several weaknesses in their conceptual framework and their use of Simon's phases of decision making. We argue that the true relationship between the phases of decision making and the intangibility of DSS benefits is exactly the opposite of what Pieptea and Anderson claim it to be. In the construction of Dimension II, Pieptea and Anderson unjustifiably collapse four criteria into one. Furthermore, some of their criteria appear in the definitions of both the dimensions of their framework. They equate the intangibility of benefits with "value-price gap," which could mislead managers into believing that all DSS with high degree of intangibility are ipso facto justified.
MIS Quarterly © 1990 Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota