You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
A Study of Analysis Errors Caused by Nitrite and Free Available Chlorine during Iodometric Titration of Total Residual Chlorine in Wastewater
Edward A. Dietz, Jr., Remi Cortellucci and Mary Williams
Water Environment Research
Vol. 68, No. 6 (Sep. - Oct., 1996), pp. 974-980
Published by: Water Environment Federation
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25044800
Page Count: 7
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Nitrites, Chlorine, Chloramines, Oxidation, Ammonia, Oxides, Reagents, Titration, Wastewater, Wastewater treatment
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Nitrite and free available chlorine (FAC) are reported to cause errors in total residual chlorine (TRC) measurements when following the Standard Methods back-titration procedure with iodate titrant. Nitrite caused elevated TRC results when using either phenylarsine oxide or thiosulfate, which are the alternative reducing reagents specified in the procedure. FAC caused no error when phenylarsine oxide was used; however, TRC results were low when using thiosulfate. These errors are explained based on studies of the analysis chemistry, and method modifications are suggested for eliminating those errors. Thus, when using phenylarsine oxide, errors from nitrite were prevented by sulfamic acid, which was used to destroy nitrite. However, sulfamic acid could not be used with thiosulfate because the acidity of sulfamic acid induced a reaction between nitrite and thiosulfate. Errors from FAC are traced to an upset in the analysis reaction stoichiometry. With FAC present in samples, thiosulfate was not exclusively oxidized to tetrathionate. Instead, thiosulfate was partially converted to sulfate due to the strong oxidizing power of FAC. However, errors from FAC were eliminated by changing the order of reagent addition used in the analysis.
Water Environment Research © 1996 Water Environment Federation