You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Phylogenetics of Mentha (Lamiaceae): Evidence from Chloroplast DNA Sequences
Jiranan Bunsawat, Natalina E. Elliott, Kate L. Hertweck, Elizabeth Sproles and Lawrence A. Alice
Vol. 29, No. 4 (Oct. - Dec., 2004), pp. 959-964
Published by: American Society of Plant Taxonomists
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25064024
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Biological taxonomies, Phylogeny, Species, Botany, Plants, Ploidies, Systematics, Introns, Taxa, Phylogenetics
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Phylogenetic relationships in Mentha were inferred from DNA sequences of the chloroplast (cp) rpl16 intron and trnL-trnF region. The objectives were to test monophyly of Mentha and each of its sections and assess relationships among Mentha species. Based on cpDNA data, Mentha is strongly supported as monophyletic. The suggestions that M. cervina and M. cunninghamii should be placed in other genera gain no support from this analysis. Mentha cervina is sister to M. gattefossei, and the New Zealand endemic, M. cunninghamii, is allied with species from Australia (M. australis, M. diemenica, M. satureioides). No recognized section with more than one species sampled forms a monophyletic group. Section Pulegium may be monophyletic, but the third member of this section, M. grandiflora, was not sampled. Chloroplast DNA sequences of the putative allopolyploids M. canadensis and M. spicata suggest that M. arvensis and M. longifolia, respectively, may be their maternal parents.
Systematic Botany © 2004 American Society of Plant Taxonomists