You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Thomas Walter Herbarium Is Not the Herbarium of Thomas Walter
Daniel B. Ward
Vol. 56, No. 3 (Aug., 2007), pp. 917-926
Published by: International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT)
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25065873
Page Count: 10
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Evidence is strong that the specimens in the folio volume commonly known as the "Walter Herbarium," Natural History Museum, London, and often assumed to be the basis for the names in Thomas Walter's Flora Caroliniana (1788), are a collection gathered by John Fraser and, though seen and partially annotated by Walter, were in large part not employed by him in preparation of his book. In no case may a specimen be considered a holotype. A small number of specimens, of species from outside the area studied by Walter, may have been part of materials brought to him by Fraser, and may be interpreted as lectotypes. The great majority of specimens, though contemporary in time and often bearing Walter's handwriting, are irrelevant to typification of the Walter names of his Flora. This argument is based on identification by photograph and direct examination of many of the specimens, on determination of the handwriting of the labels as of Walter or of Fraser, and on comparison of the names of the book with the specimens of the folio.
Taxon © 2007 International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT)