You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Estimating the Incidence of Wrongdoing and Whistle-Blowing: Results of a Study Using Randomized Response Technique
Brian K. Burton and Janet P. Near
Journal of Business Ethics
Vol. 14, No. 1 (Jan., 1995), pp. 17-30
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25072618
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Cheating, Questionnaires, Whistles, Medical students, Teachers, Estimation methods, College students, Statistical models, Business ethics, Social desirability
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Student cheating and reporting of that cheating represents one form of organizational wrongdoing and subsequent whistle-blowing, in the context of an academic organization. Previous research has been hampered by a lack of information concerning the validity of survey responses estimating the incidence of organizational wrongdoing and whistle-blowing. An innovative method, the Randomized Response Technique (RRT), was used here to assess the validity of reported incidences of wrongdoing and whistle-blowing. Surprisingly, our findings show that estimates of these incidences did not vary significantly when RRT questionnaire results were compared to those obtained from standard surveys. In fact, a large number of business undergraduates admitted cheating while only a small percentage reported peers' cheating when they observed it. These results should be sobering for managers and their implications are considered in some detail.
Journal of Business Ethics © 1995 Springer