You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
Confidentiality Decisions: The Reasoning Process of CPAS in Resolving Ethical Dilemmas
Barbara L. Adams, Fannie L. Malone and Woodrow James
Journal of Business Ethics
Vol. 14, No. 12 (Dec., 1995), pp. 1015-1020
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25072722
Page Count: 6
Preview not available
As in other professions, such as law and medicine, accounting has a Code of Professional Conduct (Code) that members are expected to abide by. In today's legalistic society, however, the question of "what is the right thing to do," is often confused with "what is legal?" In many instances, this may present a conflict between adhering to the Code and doing what some may perceive as proper ethical behavior. This paper examines (1) the reasoning process that CPAs use in resolving ethical issues related to confidentiality; and, (2) whether or not there is a perceived conflict in adhering to the Code and the moral values of some CPAs. The results indicate that although most CPAs sampled resolve ethical issues in accordance with the Code, such decisions do not always reflect their belief of what is morally right. Although the results are useful in understanding how some CPAs reason in making moral choices involving confidentiality decisions, care should be exercised in drawing further inferences from this study due to the limited sample size.
Journal of Business Ethics © 1995 Springer