You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Individual and Situational Factors on Unethical Behavioral Intentions in the Workplace
Gwen E. Jones and Michael J. Kavanagh
Journal of Business Ethics
Vol. 15, No. 5 (May, 1996), pp. 511-523
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25072775
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Ethical behavior, Business ethics, Locus of control, Research ethics, Peer pressure, Machiavellianism, Situational ethics, Social ethics, Ethical dilemmas, Psychology
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Using a 2 × 2 × 2 experimental design, the effects of situational and individual variables on individuals' intentions to act unethically were investigated. Specifically examined were three situational variables: (1) quality of the work experience (good versus poor), (2) peer influences (unethical versus ethical), and (3) managerial influences (unethical versus ethical), and three individual variables: (4) locus of control, (5) Machiavellianism, and (6) gender, on individuals' behavioral intentions in an ethically ambiguous dilemma in an work setting. Experiment 1 revealed main effects for quality of work experience, Machiavellianism, locus of control, and an interaction effect for peer influences and managerial influences. Experiment 2 showed main effects for all three situational variables and Machiavellianism. Neither experiment supported gender differences. Limitations, future research, and implications for management are discussed.
Journal of Business Ethics © 1996 Springer