You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
An Investigation of Ethical Perceptions of Public Sector MIS Professionals
Ken Udas, William L. Fuerst and David B. Paradice
Journal of Business Ethics
Vol. 15, No. 7 (Jul., 1996), pp. 721-734
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25072799
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Ethical codes, Professional ethics, Professional associations, Business ethics, Social ethics, Professional responsibilities, Professional development schools, Legal professionals, Medical personnel, Professional standards
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Management information system (MIS) professionals have a central role in technology development, determining how technology is used in organizations, and the effects it has on clients and society. MIS stakeholders have expressed concern regarding MIS professional's role in computer crime, and security of electronically stored information. It is recognized that MIS professionals must make decisions based on their professional ethics. The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and the Data Processing Management Association (DPMA) have developed codes of ethics to help guide practitioners with ethical professional decision making. In this study, a model was developed from the combined ACM and DPMA codes of ethics and used in the construction of a survey instrument. The survey was conducted using public sector MIS professionals, and findings relative to the influences that codes of ethics, ethical enforcement systems, and membership in professional organizations has on ethical perception were studied. In addition, the influence that ethical obligation to particular constituencies had on respondents' ethical attitudes was also investigated. The study indicated that ethical obligation of public sector MIS professionals is stronger for management and employers than for peers, society, or clients.
Journal of Business Ethics © 1996 Springer